Through one mechanism or another many different narratives are laced through the events that transpired around Maura's disappearance. The main problem with how they have been collected and analyzed throughout the year is that one explanation or question leaves out information that is not immediately evident. In fact, it was this realization that led me to begin this timeline pursuit in the first place.
The example we will start with is the problems with Witness A's timeline. I spent time reading lots of information and interpretations of events. The general sentiment in the community is that it doesn't make sense. The problem with that conclusion is not so much that it is wrong (because there are inconsistencies), but that they do not take into all of the information needed for an explanation. In the first case, the go to problem with Witness A's story is that if she made a call from Beaver Pond at 7:52 and she saw 001 at the accident scene, 001 must have been there earlier than the 7:46 arrival time noted in the Grafton County Logs. I will dissect the situation for you and provide you with detailed information that you can use to draw your own conclusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment