I am shifting my focus back to getting this knot of information untangled and organized for public consumption after my little foray into the world of theory presentation and defense.
I have decided to embark on a long venture of getting this data in a format for discussion that is easy, unified, and easily reference to facilitate online discussion of the case.
I am not trying to convince you to fund this -- If you want to help me out its fine, if not the content will remain the same.
I spend about 10-15 hours a week researching, analyzing, digitizing, organizing and reporting on data related to the Maura Murray Case. I also occasionally investigate different angles to add to the body of knowledge. I incur expenses to do so in addition to my time.
I estimate this project will consume 12 - 18 months to complete.
I am sure this looks like I am trying to cash in on a missing persons case, and honestly I have no way to prove to you that I am not. All I can say is that you can see the products I produce for consumption by the community at large and my goal is to create a usable body of information for people to reference in discussions. Nothing comprehensive exists at this time that simplifies the content.
I plan to be accountable for any people that wish to help in a monetary fashion, however until this gets going I do not know exactly how to do so.
Become a Patron!
Sunday, January 12, 2020
Introducing Weekly Email Subscription
I hate shamelessly self-promoting on places like reddit. So if you are interested in weekly developments of this blog sign up for the weekly newsletter:
Introducing Evernote Links
One of the main challenges in having a robust fact-based discussion is that the information is all over the place. I like to use Evernote to record my research journey. If you are not using a notes program for this case I highly suggest it.
I will be adding links to quickly add pages to your own notebooks.
Evernote Website
I will be adding links to quickly add pages to your own notebooks.
Evernote Website
Reaching out to Sprint for Clarification
An interesting thought came to me while working towards completing a useful digital database of the phone records available for the case. I am not interest in sharing why I am asking this question specifically, but in the interest of transparency I figured I'd release the request:
Google Drive Link
Evernote Link
Google Drive Link
Evernote Link
Saturday, January 11, 2020
Friday, January 10, 2020
Letter to Grafton County Sheriff's Department Dispatch Center
Part of my January 2020 trajectory included new avenues to falsify the conclusion I made in Witness A/001: A Plausible Account. One such avenue included reaching out the the Grafton County Sheriff's Department Dispatch Center for clarification. Here is the letter I sent:
Monday, January 6, 2020
Maura Murray Timeline: Where are we going from here, January 2020
Video Below
My schedule is back to normal so I have gone ahead and set out to continue working on the timeline project. Here is where we stand:
1. Witness A/001: A Plausible Account was released that provided some of the mathematical framework to better understand the emergency response to Maura's crash. 2 accompanying animations were also released shortly thereafter followed by my reading on YouTube for those who may rely on audio information.
2. The report was released on one of the smaller subreddits where 002 conspiracy theorists abounded. This was by design -- for one, maybe I missed something and the report would need to be scrapped or corrected. A second reason was to see what type of reaction the 002 people would come back with. Sometimes defending your work results in the need for correction, but often it leads to new ideas, ways to present more effectively, and figuring out what areas need to be boned up on for the reader.
Initially I enjoyed talking about the issues with 002 people. I patiently went through most posts line-by-line to explain whatever questions or criticisms people had. There were plenty of people that did not agree with me, but only one person, who generally agreed with my sentiments in the report pointed out factual errors that I addressed and corrected. Basically any meaningful dialog stopped as a result of the 002 folks being preemptively critical and reflexively critical. By the end most had so far confused the math in the pursuit of proving this analysis wrong that there own version of events no longer worked. I put out a blanket timeline challenge and thus far have not received anything.
3. Trixy contacted me to pin the analysis to the main Maura Murray Sub. This was a great opportunity for more criticism from folks that are not necessarily only interested in the Witness A/001 issue.
4. The central tenet of the analysis is that the 7:46 arrival time is not accurate. In the report, I stated that I believed it was due to it being the arrival time for the Atwood Call. Since the release others have made other great reasoning.
5. During this process I set out to find clarification about how the system worked for the dispatcher to input various times for the call. I had located other police logs that shared the formatting and abbreviation of the ones from Maura's case. I searched and inquired but the answer eluded me, but HugeRaspberry seems to have found the software company. Contacts have been made to further clarify the system. More to come in the future.
6. This week I plan to reach out to the GCSD to attempt clarification about the system and time entry process/interpretation.
7. Monaghan's report seemingly has issues with Dot and RO's timeline. I will be working with fulk and swansong to get these stories in the standard timeline format.
8. We see where the next set of timelines goes and hopefully verify whether or not the clerical aspect of the report is sound information.
I am going to do a commentary video probably tomorrow morning to discuss some of this in verbal detail.
My schedule is back to normal so I have gone ahead and set out to continue working on the timeline project. Here is where we stand:
1. Witness A/001: A Plausible Account was released that provided some of the mathematical framework to better understand the emergency response to Maura's crash. 2 accompanying animations were also released shortly thereafter followed by my reading on YouTube for those who may rely on audio information.
2. The report was released on one of the smaller subreddits where 002 conspiracy theorists abounded. This was by design -- for one, maybe I missed something and the report would need to be scrapped or corrected. A second reason was to see what type of reaction the 002 people would come back with. Sometimes defending your work results in the need for correction, but often it leads to new ideas, ways to present more effectively, and figuring out what areas need to be boned up on for the reader.
Initially I enjoyed talking about the issues with 002 people. I patiently went through most posts line-by-line to explain whatever questions or criticisms people had. There were plenty of people that did not agree with me, but only one person, who generally agreed with my sentiments in the report pointed out factual errors that I addressed and corrected. Basically any meaningful dialog stopped as a result of the 002 folks being preemptively critical and reflexively critical. By the end most had so far confused the math in the pursuit of proving this analysis wrong that there own version of events no longer worked. I put out a blanket timeline challenge and thus far have not received anything.
3. Trixy contacted me to pin the analysis to the main Maura Murray Sub. This was a great opportunity for more criticism from folks that are not necessarily only interested in the Witness A/001 issue.
4. The central tenet of the analysis is that the 7:46 arrival time is not accurate. In the report, I stated that I believed it was due to it being the arrival time for the Atwood Call. Since the release others have made other great reasoning.
5. During this process I set out to find clarification about how the system worked for the dispatcher to input various times for the call. I had located other police logs that shared the formatting and abbreviation of the ones from Maura's case. I searched and inquired but the answer eluded me, but HugeRaspberry seems to have found the software company. Contacts have been made to further clarify the system. More to come in the future.
6. This week I plan to reach out to the GCSD to attempt clarification about the system and time entry process/interpretation.
7. Monaghan's report seemingly has issues with Dot and RO's timeline. I will be working with fulk and swansong to get these stories in the standard timeline format.
8. We see where the next set of timelines goes and hopefully verify whether or not the clerical aspect of the report is sound information.
I am going to do a commentary video probably tomorrow morning to discuss some of this in verbal detail.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)